Digital Transformation ≠ Paperless

In our previous post we talked about the importance of Digital Transformation and how it is more than just going paperless or implementing new technology.

It means doing things differently in an increasingly connected world — using new mindsets, skillsets, technologies and data to benefit people, society and the economy.

This week we look into the importance of strategy for successful integration, look at how age can be a barrier, and explore a well known business who went bust not because they didn’t explore digital, but because they didn’t evolve the way their business operated. 

Some assembly required

Digital transformation is not just about buying a new piece of technology, turning it on and hoping for the best as that ignores two key details: 

1. Technology is not an outcome. It is simply a tool which enables an outcome. Despite what it promises on the package, no system will transform your business overnight. It has even less chance of doing so if a solution is purchased without any understanding as to why it is needed.

When it comes to digital transformation it can be difficult to determine what are the right tools for your business. This could result in a purchase that will not meet your requirements.

A solution should only be chosen as part of a sustainable strategy that clearly defines the business outcomes and problems which need to be solved. A digital Transformation strategy needs to look at a range of factors, including:

  • Process – what processes will support digital transformation and how might they need to change
  • Policy – do you need to evolve or implement new company policies
  • People – what roles will be required to deliver and support the strategy and its outcomes
  • Data – are you currently capturing the right information to support a transformation. If you need to capture different information, what might this mean for your regulatory obligations
  • Business Models – especially those relating to revenue and cost. In our case study we explore how a business failed to understand the impact of revenue on its baseline

Unless you address all of these, any strategy is incomplete

2. There’s often a legacy environment you need to deal with

Most organisations use legacy applications and systems that continue to serve critical business needs. Digital transformation requires balancing keeping the  legacy environments running with delivering newer, more efficient systems that makes use of current and emerging technologies. 

It’s not always possible to integrate the legacy environment into the new model presented by digital transformation – and it gets harder the older a system gets. This can lead to rising costs as various constraints are uncovered through the process. 

In addition to the strategy above, any transformation exercise needs to include a review of the existing technology to understand what constraints may exist and how to overcome them. Failure to do this cloud the overall picture and could end up with you continuing to operate in the old world far longer than you planned.

Failing to plan is a recipe for disaster

Digital transformation is a multi-layered approach. Planning is a significant step in the journey as you will ensure that your outcomes will be achieved.

Case Study: Netflix didn’t kill Blockbuster

The 2010 bankruptcy of Blockbuster is frequently cited as an example of a company that lost market share due to the introduction of an online streaming service, Netflix, which they weren’t able to compete with due to their business models being reliant on brick and mortar stores. While it is true that the rise in Netflix coincided with the fall in Blockbuster, it was not the  business model that was the problem: it was  a revenue model that relied on penalising the customer coupled with a mistaken belief that technology wouldn’t disrupt Blockbuster as fast as it did.

When Netflix first started out in 1997 their business model focussed on DVD Rentals via mail – they had heavily reliance on the postal service which made the service he service was somewhat slow and cumbersome and ensured people couldn’t just pick up a movie for the night on their way home. They also struggled to gain brand recognition as, without retail locations, customers couldn’t find it.

While Blockbuster initially dismissed Netflix as a niche player, even dismissing an offer to purchase them in 2000, former CEO John Antioco soon saw the inevitable and started to adapt the business models. In 2005, Blockbuster abolished late fees (Netflix offered a subscription model which didn’t penalise customers) and invested heavily in an online platform, Total Access, which allowed customers to rent DVD’s online, return them to the store, and receive a free movie as a result. Growth in the online platform was significant and Netflix offered to sell-up and were again turned down again.

This move didn’t quite go as Antioco had anticipated and he soon found himself forced out of the company. The reason behind this is simple – revenue. Blockbusters model had one major weakness – an significant amount of revenue was mate by charging customers late fees. By removing the late fees, there was significant risk to company profits which Antioco’s detractors focussed on. 

The incoming CEO reinstated the late fees, throttled back investment  in the online platform, and eventually started to explore streaming in 2008. By then it was too late – Netflix had been offering video on demand since 2007 and as a result were growing their customer base. As customers started to switch their mindset from DVD rentals to online streaming, the revenue from late fees started to dry up and eventually Blockbuster ceased to exist.

Conclusion:

Netflix alone didn’t kill Blockbuster, and possibly never would have. Blockbuster killed themselves by relying to heavily on late fees and customer penalties to drive revenue. Diversifying the business model to ensure different revenue streams may have  seen a different outcome. 

sources: 

https://hbr.org/2011/04/how-i-did-it-blockbusters-former-ceo-on-sparring-with-an-activist-shareholder

https://www.forbes.com/sites/gregsatell/2013/08/01/the-myth-of-the-moron-ceo/#2831c9f52c58

https://www.forbes.com/sites/gregsatell/2014/09/05/a-look-back-at-why-blockbuster-really-failed-and-why-it-didnt-have-to/#2744a5941d64

01

Experimenting Is Not Just For Labs

After doing the vital background work that we covered in our last two blogs, you’re finally ready to move on to the next phase – solution mo…

Learn More / >

02

Build vs buy. What’s the right choice for your enterprise?

In our last blog we looked at how you can clearly identify problems, so you have a strong grip on the complexity of the problem and its boun…

Learn More / >

03

Problem Solving? Try Problem Identifying

A costly and common mistake: underestimating the power of problem statements.

Learn More / >

Testimonials

"One of Ant's strengths is relating to owners in a visionary sense and talking to people who are on the ground...[Ant has a] wide understanding of different systems, processes and applications and can articulate where we're going and what the possibilities are...working with Ant has changed the way we make decisions about IT structures and support systems."

Felicity Hopkins, Director - Research Review

We hired Ant to support us with an important project after he was highly recommended by colleagues. Ant was responsive, speedy, super-helpful and helped us to make key decisions. We appreciated his broad experience, and his ability to hold a high level strategic view alongside expert advice on details. We will definitely be consulting with Ant again and are happy to recommend him.

Gaynor Parkin, CEO at Umbrella Wellbring

"We don’t need a full-time CTO [chief technology officer]. Ant knows enough about our business he can deliver it virtually. He can translate things for us. During project management, Ant came into his own... Ant gets his head round your business and [took his time] understanding our context. He was really clear about pausing on investment into the app...Ant's inquisitive, curious and approachable - he's very easy to work with."

Gus McIntosh, Chief Executive - Winsborough

"Ant was really quick to understand the business model and our processes and IT structures."

James Armstrong, Director - MediData

"Ant helped us at the early stages of Aerotruth helping us to plan our technical infrastructure and ensure we built a product that would scale. Ant was great to work with and we really valued his support and contribution to Aerotruth"

Bryce Currie, Co-Founder & Chief Commercial Officer - Aerotruth