In my last two blogs on EA4SME I put forward the argument that, deployed correctly, Enterprise Architecture (EA) has the potential to provide huge benefits to SMEs, and promoted a simple framework that could be followed to enable the selection of the right solutions for a business.
Today I will address the elements of solution selection, coupled with what it’s going to take to deliver it.
Introducing the delivery funnel
The previous post introduced the EA4SME model, a reflection of the overall approach broken down into the steps that need to occur along the way. It also covered the strategy funnel which addressed covered off the first three elements of EA4SME.
Solution selection and delivery is covered in the final three stages off the EA4SME model, starting in the same phase that strategy funnel ends. This overlap reflects the fact that the strategy phase Builds to a point where a solution can be selected that doesn’t address the selection of the solution.
Once this point has been reached, a new model is required. This is where the delivery funnel is introduced.
Similar to the Strategy funnel, the delivery funnel provides a phased approach for how a business will select, implement, and then manage the solutions required to solve the problems addressed in the earlier phase.
It is also still critical to carry out continual evaluation – both the journey towards a target state and the external environment, which can change significantly as we have just seen with Covid 19.
Phase 8: Solution Selection
The strategy funnel provided a clear framework to get you to the point where you could choose a selection. This is not to say that the solution will stand out from the pack, as capabilities can often be delivered by more than one solution (And sometimes may not even be a system).
It’s at this point that any good business needs to follow a clear framework to assist possible solutions against the requirements articulated in the target state.
This could follow two pathways:
To keep it simple this blog will address systems, we will cover the skills element another day.
To select systems, larger companies often follow a procurement process, usually issuing a Request For Proposal (RFP) where vendors are asked to present how their solution will deliver the target state. This is a process that smaller companies can adopt to suit their needs, either led from within or through partnerships with procurement specialists.
Once all vendors have presented on how their products will deliver the target state, the businesses be able to assess the solutions against a list of criteria that has been defined in the earlier strategy phase and make a decision. The strategy should always serve as the guiding document through this process and ensuring that the solutions identified continue to add value to the company.
The intent behind this is to embed good practice into the way organisations select their technology. It also ensures that the solution that is delivered can solve the problems that the business has identified.
This strategy should serve as a guiding document through this process to ensure that the solutions identified continue to add value to the company
Phase 9: Delivery management
There is plenty of debate that goes on about the best model for delivery, waterfall and agile being two of the more commonly known ones. That’s not what this phase is about though.
This phase requires a business to identify the steps that need to be taken to move through the critical path identified in phase 7. The difference here is that critical path covers the high-level plan while delivery management goes into more detail on the steps that need to happen around data migration, the purchase of the solutions and configuration and installation.
While I won’t tell you the right methodology to use, I strongly urge you to follow one as they contain best practice which will ensure the delivery is as painless as possible. This phase may be led by the business or in collaboration with the vendor who is delivering the solution. The important part to focus on though is that the business maintains accountability of all decision making, and that the solutions delivered still solve the problems identified in the strategic development.
Phase 10: Service Excellence
Overlapping with phase 9 is Service Excellence. In this phase you need to address support and ownership models around the solutions you are purchasing. This includes but is not limited to:
In addition to the above, this phase also covers the remediation and decommissioning of any old systems which are no longer required.
As with phase nine this may be led by the business or in collaboration with the vendor, but overall accountability remains with the business.
The result of all of this is the selection of solutions which solve business problems, then delivering them in a way that ensures your business can maintain a leading edge amongst competitors.
The final blog in the EA4SME series will provide a case study where this has been used!
Want to know more about EA4SME? Get in touch today!
Sources used to shape the thinking of this blog:
Van Elsacker Louisnord, N. 2018, Make service excellence part of service management
Bernaert, M., Poels, G., Snoeck M., De Backer, M., 2014. Enterprise Architecture for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Starting Point for Bringing EA to SMEs, Based on Adoption Models
Burns, P., Neutens, M., Newman, D., Power, T., 2009. Building Value through Enterprise Architecture: A Global Study. Booz and Co.
Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.C., 2006. Enterprise Architecture As Strategy: Creating A Foundation for Business Execution
Commentary and discussion with peers.
For anyone who knows Target State, you’ll know that we talk about digital transformation a lot. This is because it’s a essential ingredient…
(TLDR) It’s no longer enough for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to stay informed about the latest trends and emerging technologies. A digi…
How MSPs Lead the Charge with Personalised and Strategic IT Services. As organisations look to digitise more of their systems and processes…
"One of Ant's strengths is relating to owners in a visionary sense and talking to people who are on the ground...[Ant has a] wide understanding of different systems, processes and applications and can articulate where we're going and what the possibilities are...working with Ant has changed the way we make decisions about IT structures and support systems."
We hired Ant to support us with an important project after he was highly recommended by colleagues. Ant was responsive, speedy, super-helpful and helped us to make key decisions. We appreciated his broad experience, and his ability to hold a high level strategic view alongside expert advice on details. We will definitely be consulting with Ant again and are happy to recommend him.
"We don’t need a full-time CTO [chief technology officer]. Ant knows enough about our business he can deliver it virtually. He can translate things for us. During project management, Ant came into his own... Ant gets his head round your business and [took his time] understanding our context. He was really clear about pausing on investment into the app...Ant's inquisitive, curious and approachable - he's very easy to work with."
"Ant was really quick to understand the business model and our processes and IT structures."
"Ant helped us at the early stages of Aerotruth helping us to plan our technical infrastructure and ensure we built a product that would scale. Ant was great to work with and we really valued his support and contribution to Aerotruth"
"No question has ever been too silly. Ant's been accommodating and helped me understand. I've valued that he understands the charitable sector really well. He can look through the experience that he has with larger organisations and what's the reality for a small and mighty charity where you don't have teams of people that can come in and project manage an IT project"
"Having Anthony was really valuable – to lean in on his skillset – and his connections. He was able to provide impartial advice about the different strengths [of the providers]. It was important that we undertook a good due diligence process. Having Anthony there meant we had impartial selection as well, which is very important to us and [something] other not-for-profits [could benefit from]."