Small and medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) are important drivers of economy. SMEs face a number of problems due to a lack of structure and overview of the company. Enterprise architecture (EA) can be used as a holistic approach to keep things aligned in a company, regardless of size.
In this blog we put forth an argument for the benefits of EA to the SME Sector
Enterprises are complex and highly integrated systems which comprise of People, processes, information and technologies with interrelationships and dependencies to reach common goals. The size of an enterprise is defined by the number of employees it has. While definitions vary across countries, in New Zealand these are defined as (1):
According to the latest data from Statistics New Zealand, SMEs account for 99.6% of all enterprises in the country and contribute nearly 58% of total industry sales in 2018 (2).
While SMEs are important drivers of economy, they face several problems due to a lack of experience and knowledge in certain domains common across all businesses.
SMEs are typically characterized as enterprises with flat hierarchies, non-bureaucratic structures, limited resources (personnel and financial), operating in specific corners of the market or having a specific customer base. The day-to-day business is specialized, but flexible to change based on the requirements of individual customers.
Within a small business, the owner is often working in their own company. In medium-sized enterprises this task is often replaced and augmented by other activities like making decisions, depending on the amount of information about the environment, the risks, and chances. As a result, the decision processes of SME are often highly centralized.
SMEs are often more focused on the operational planning and controlling than strategic aspects and the use of controlling instruments is often limited. In addition, there is a big difference between the knowledge about the importance of such management models and the implementation of concrete measures. While this does not apply to every SME, surveys have shown that the majority of SME fit them (3).
As technology is a major element of both costs and added value on a business there is interest in the long-term existence of IT systems, yet there still exists a gap in how SMEs approach their technology strategy. Regardless of size it is necessary to identify and rectify these gaps to remain competitive and grow. These gaps are often a result of the five common challenges impacting IT adoption in SMEs:
From these challenges it is possible to derive criteria that can be a guidance for developing techniques that have a higher fit with SMEs:
(adapted from 4)
This is where an Enterprise Architecture (EA) approach can help. Traditionally found in larger companies EA is the process by which organizations standardise and organise technology to align with business goals. It aligns systems with the people and processes they support while focussing on both cost efficiency and flexibility of the IT systems.
Following EA good practice businesses can focus on both cost efficiency and flexibility of the IT systems in alignment with supporting digital transformation, IT growth and the modernization of IT within the business. This leads to a more mature approach to selecting and managing technology in SMBs as decisions are approached strategically rather than tactically.
There is strong evidence that EA provides value to those large organisations which use it. For example, the EA group of a large bank delivered cost savings more than $200 million (1.4% of the company’s operating expenditure) through IT asset rationalisation and reuse (5). In another example a large-scale IT-enabled business transformation EA organisation to avoid more than $20 million in costs in the first year of the program (about 2% of the total cost of the five-year program) through the identification of synergies and reuse opportunities (6).
The non-financial benefits of following an EA model include:
Deployed correctly EA has the potential to provide these benefits to SMEs by providing the view of the relationships between the people, processes, information, and technology. The challenge is that it is not a well-known construct outside of big business. Exploratory conversations with New Zealand SMEs confirm that few know of or utilise EA capabilities, research that is supported in overseas markets.
And that is what we are on a mission to resolve.
In our next blog, we’ll explore how a business in the Enterprise Architecture for SMEs can be utilised to drive and sustain growth.
Want to know more? Contact us today
(3) Wibotzki, M., Timm, F., Sonnenberger, A., 2015. A Survey on Enterprsie Architecture Management in Small and Medium Enterprises.
(4) Bernaert, M., Poels, G., Snoeck M., De Backer, M., 2014. Enterprise Architecture for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Starting Point for Bringing EA to SMEs, Based on Adoption Models
(5) Burns, P., Neutens, M., Newman, D., Power, T., 2009. Building Value through Enterprise Architecture: A Global Study. Booz and Co.
(6) Tamm, T., Seddon, P., Shanks, G., Reynolds, P., Frampton, K.M., 2015. How an Australian retailer enabled business transformation through enterprise architecture.
For anyone who knows Target State, you’ll know that we talk about digital transformation a lot. This is because it’s a essential ingredient…
(TLDR) It’s no longer enough for Managed Service Providers (MSPs) to stay informed about the latest trends and emerging technologies. A digi…
How MSPs Lead the Charge with Personalised and Strategic IT Services. As organisations look to digitise more of their systems and processes…
"One of Ant's strengths is relating to owners in a visionary sense and talking to people who are on the ground...[Ant has a] wide understanding of different systems, processes and applications and can articulate where we're going and what the possibilities are...working with Ant has changed the way we make decisions about IT structures and support systems."
We hired Ant to support us with an important project after he was highly recommended by colleagues. Ant was responsive, speedy, super-helpful and helped us to make key decisions. We appreciated his broad experience, and his ability to hold a high level strategic view alongside expert advice on details. We will definitely be consulting with Ant again and are happy to recommend him.
"We don’t need a full-time CTO [chief technology officer]. Ant knows enough about our business he can deliver it virtually. He can translate things for us. During project management, Ant came into his own... Ant gets his head round your business and [took his time] understanding our context. He was really clear about pausing on investment into the app...Ant's inquisitive, curious and approachable - he's very easy to work with."
"Ant was really quick to understand the business model and our processes and IT structures."
"Ant helped us at the early stages of Aerotruth helping us to plan our technical infrastructure and ensure we built a product that would scale. Ant was great to work with and we really valued his support and contribution to Aerotruth"
"No question has ever been too silly. Ant's been accommodating and helped me understand. I've valued that he understands the charitable sector really well. He can look through the experience that he has with larger organisations and what's the reality for a small and mighty charity where you don't have teams of people that can come in and project manage an IT project"
"Having Anthony was really valuable – to lean in on his skillset – and his connections. He was able to provide impartial advice about the different strengths [of the providers]. It was important that we undertook a good due diligence process. Having Anthony there meant we had impartial selection as well, which is very important to us and [something] other not-for-profits [could benefit from]."