Last year, New Zealand’s Productivity Commission revealed our country’s productivity is “among [the] worst in [the] OECD”. As outlined in our previous blog, productivity is one of three key levers in generating business success so it’s vital we take it seriously.
One of the driving factors of sub-par productivity is waste. Waste can be found in both doing or spending too much – inefficiencies and duplication; or not doing enough – untapped or underutilised potential.
Waste is harmful to profits, performance, reputation, and wellbeing. Left unchecked, waste can stop you achieving your goals, create bottlenecks of the hair-pulling-out variety, and drive people to leave en masse – both your staff and customers.
What we need is a model for reviewing waste at every touchpoint.
If you’re invested in boosting efficiency and reducing waste, chances are you’ve heard the acronym coined by Taiichi Ohno, Chief Engineer at Toyota, TIMWOOD.
If you haven’t, or need a recap, here’s what it stands for:
Transport
Inventory
Motion
Waiting
Overproduction
Overprocessing
Defects
Later, in the 1990s, an eighth area was added:
Skills
A similar acronym that can be easier to remember is DOWNTIME:
Defects
Overproduction
Waiting
Non-utilising talent (skill)
Transportation
Inventory excess
Motion
Extra processing
But we’re not Toyota. How does this apply to us?
Although the TIMWOOD approach has its roots in manufacturing, its principles transfer across other industries and organisations. Any business or organisation who cares about productive people, processes, systems, and policies can evaluate their performance – and identify areas of improvement – through a TIMWOOD lens.
In the interest of keeping this blog snappy (we know your time’s precious) we’re going to combine the themes TIMWOOD and DOWNTIME into five key areas and get you started with some high-level questions.
1) What’s the hold up? Transport, motion, waiting.
A productive organisation keeps people, ideas, goods and services, and equipment flowing smoothly – there’s ongoing momentum.
2) Does it all feel too much? Inventory and overproduction.
Inventory could be physical – your stock and office supplies, and digital – how you store and process data on your laptops or in the cloud.
Overproduction is producing more than you – or the market – needs and desires before validating it’s necessary or desirable. The key to keeping it lean is to find your inventory and production sweetspot: ordering and producing what you need and cutting back on excess.
3) What’s broken? Defects.
Time and money can be wasted on fixing what’s broken. And what was working in the past can become inappropriate, ineffective, or irrelevant later.
Refunds, repeated work, and resolving a complaint are important, but that time could be better spent elsewhere. Having policies and processes where you can foresee, or even better, prevent defects or obsolescence reduces waste and boosts your productivity.
4) Not making the most of your people? Skills.
It’s a waste of a good hire when an organisation doesn’t fully tap into their potential and encourage them to flourish. Missed opportunities, ideas falling through the cracks, and resentment can be corrosive and expensive.
5) Is going the extra mile one step too many? Overprocessing.
Adding extra meetings to the diary when an email or phone call will do. Inserting new features to a service but not validating that’s what your customers want first. Having several layers of sign-off when a flatter hierarchy can be just as robust. Sometimes going the extra mile is not prudent or good customer service, it’s wasteful.
How can my organisation be more productive?
We’ve deliberately left out the solutions to these questions because they will be unique to your organisation and industry. But we get that might feel frustrating, so we will run through some examples in our future blogs.
If you don’t want to wait until then, we’d love to hear from you. We’re always up for a chat and coffee. Please get in touch and let us know how we can help you and your business.
Further reading:
https://safetyculture.com/topics/timwood/
https://www.leantransitionsolutions.com/Lean-Technology/eliminate-8-lean-wastes
https://www.productivity.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Annual_Report_2022-23-final.pdf
https://www.lean.org/the-lean-post/articles/the-eight-wastes-of-lean/
Left unchecked, waste can stop you achieving your goals, create bottlenecks of the hair-pulling-out variety, and drive people to leave en masse – both your staff and customers.
16
In our last blog we looked at how you can clearly identify problems, so you have a strong grip on the complexity of the problem and its boun…
17
A costly and common mistake: underestimating the power of problem statements.
18
But don’t worry.
"One of Ant's strengths is relating to owners in a visionary sense and talking to people who are on the ground...[Ant has a] wide understanding of different systems, processes and applications and can articulate where we're going and what the possibilities are...working with Ant has changed the way we make decisions about IT structures and support systems."
We hired Ant to support us with an important project after he was highly recommended by colleagues. Ant was responsive, speedy, super-helpful and helped us to make key decisions. We appreciated his broad experience, and his ability to hold a high level strategic view alongside expert advice on details. We will definitely be consulting with Ant again and are happy to recommend him.
"We don’t need a full-time CTO [chief technology officer]. Ant knows enough about our business he can deliver it virtually. He can translate things for us. During project management, Ant came into his own... Ant gets his head round your business and [took his time] understanding our context. He was really clear about pausing on investment into the app...Ant's inquisitive, curious and approachable - he's very easy to work with."
"Ant was really quick to understand the business model and our processes and IT structures."
"Ant helped us at the early stages of Aerotruth helping us to plan our technical infrastructure and ensure we built a product that would scale. Ant was great to work with and we really valued his support and contribution to Aerotruth"
"No question has ever been too silly. Ant's been accommodating and helped me understand. I've valued that he understands the charitable sector really well. He can look through the experience that he has with larger organisations and what's the reality for a small and mighty charity where you don't have teams of people that can come in and project manage an IT project"
"Having Anthony was really valuable – to lean in on his skillset – and his connections. He was able to provide impartial advice about the different strengths [of the providers]. It was important that we undertook a good due diligence process. Having Anthony there meant we had impartial selection as well, which is very important to us and [something] other not-for-profits [could benefit from]."