Technical debt isn’t just an IT problem, it’s a silent tax on growth, agility, and customer experience. While it rarely makes the board agenda, its impact is felt everywhere: in slow product launches, ballooning support costs, and the daily grind of workarounds that sap morale. In New Zealand, where scale and resources are often tight, the consequences of ignoring technical debt can be particularly acute.
It’s easy to spot a business weighed down by legacy systems. Maybe it’s the finance team spending days reconciling data across platforms that don’t talk to each other. Or the customer service team apologising (again) for delays because the CRM can’t surface a complete customer history. Sometimes, it’s the developers who spend more time patching old code than building anything new.
These aren’t just operational headaches, they’re warning signs. Every hour spent on a manual workaround is an hour not spent on innovation, customer engagement, or growth. Over time, technical debt compounds, quietly eroding a company’s ability to compete.
The true cost of technical debt isn’t always obvious. Yes, there’s the direct spend on support and maintenance, but the bigger hit comes from missed opportunities. When systems can’t adapt, businesses can’t either. That means slower responses to market changes, delayed product launches, and lost deals when a competitor moves faster.
In the NZ context, where many businesses operate with lean teams and limited IT budgets, the margin for error is slim. Deferred upgrades or neglected integrations might seem like smart cost control in the short term, but they can lock organisations into a cycle of firefighting and lost momentum.
It’s rarely a deliberate choice. More often, it’s the result of well-intentioned decisions: a quick fix to meet a deadline, a deferred upgrade to save budget, a legacy platform kept alive because “it still works.” Over time, these decisions layer up. What starts as a shortcut becomes a roadblock.
Leadership changes, mergers, and rapid growth can all accelerate the problem. Without a clear, ongoing strategy for technology renewal, even the most innovative business can find itself stuck with systems that hold it back.
Addressing technical debt isn’t glamorous, but it is strategic. The first step is visibility. Leaders need a clear, honest assessment of where legacy systems, outdated processes, and deferred maintenance are costing the business, whether in dollars, time, or lost opportunities.
From there, it’s about prioritisation. Not all debt needs to be paid off at once. Focus on the systems and processes that most directly impact customer experience, speed to market, or regulatory risk. Involve teams from across the business, not just IT. Often, the people closest to the pain points know exactly where the biggest gains can be made.
Finally, build technical debt management into regular planning cycles. Treat it as an ongoing investment, not a one-off clean-up. That means budgeting for upgrades, setting clear standards for new projects, and rewarding teams for tackling root causes, not just symptoms.
New Zealand businesses are known for our resourcefulness and adaptability. But those strengths can be undermined if technical debt is left to fester. The organisations that thrive are the ones that face this challenge head-on, making deliberate choices about what to modernise, what to retire, and where to invest for the future.
Technical debt isn’t just an IT liability. It’s a strategic risk, and, if managed well, a source of competitive advantage. The sooner it’s on the agenda, the sooner NZ businesses can get back to what they do best: moving fast, serving customers, and staying ahead of the curve.
25
As mid-sized companies outgrow ad hoc systems but aren’t ready for full-time digital leadership, a new set of challenges emerges. This artic…
26
Cybersecurity isn’t just about protecting data; it’s a means to instil trust. Your customers, employees, and stakeholders expect their infor…
27
Digitalisation offers big promises, but it isn’t a universal solution. For many NZ businesses, the smarter choice is knowing when not to go…
"One of Ant's strengths is relating to owners in a visionary sense and talking to people who are on the ground...[Ant has a] wide understanding of different systems, processes and applications and can articulate where we're going and what the possibilities are...working with Ant has changed the way we make decisions about IT structures and support systems."
We hired Ant to support us with an important project after he was highly recommended by colleagues. Ant was responsive, speedy, super-helpful and helped us to make key decisions. We appreciated his broad experience, and his ability to hold a high level strategic view alongside expert advice on details. We will definitely be consulting with Ant again and are happy to recommend him.
"We don’t need a full-time CTO [chief technology officer]. Ant knows enough about our business he can deliver it virtually. He can translate things for us. During project management, Ant came into his own... Ant gets his head round your business and [took his time] understanding our context. He was really clear about pausing on investment into the app...Ant's inquisitive, curious and approachable - he's very easy to work with."
"Ant was really quick to understand the business model and our processes and IT structures."
"Ant helped us at the early stages of Aerotruth helping us to plan our technical infrastructure and ensure we built a product that would scale. Ant was great to work with and we really valued his support and contribution to Aerotruth"
"No question has ever been too silly. Ant's been accommodating and helped me understand. I've valued that he understands the charitable sector really well. He can look through the experience that he has with larger organisations and what's the reality for a small and mighty charity where you don't have teams of people that can come in and project manage an IT project"
"Having Anthony was really valuable – to lean in on his skillset – and his connections. He was able to provide impartial advice about the different strengths [of the providers]. It was important that we undertook a good due diligence process. Having Anthony there meant we had impartial selection as well, which is very important to us and [something] other not-for-profits [could benefit from]."
Unlike outsourced IT providers who often operate without deep business knowledge, Target State acted as our strategic partner to ensure technology was purposefully aligned with our business goals, driving real value and growth.
Ant has a clear, no-nonsense approach to technology. He focuses on outcomes, not hype, and always keeps the business context front and centre. In a world full of AI buzzwords and distractions, he’s someone who brings clarity and direction.
Although we’ve only just started working with Ant, it’s already clear he brings a thoughtful and structured approach. He quickly grasped the context and asked the right questions to get us moving in the right direction. I’m looking forward to seeing where we can take things from here, especially to ensure we cut out waste and hold vendors to account.