Improved efficiency is not a one-and-done exercise. It’s only the beginning of a process which will always need your attention.
We could be fooled into thinking improved efficiency will only bring about positives to your organisation. But take your eye off the ball and it could end up costing your business.
What is the efficiency paradox – and how could it hurt my organisation?
Imagine you are so laser focused on the quickest way to enact change or complete a process that you end up sacrificing your quality and effectiveness.
Or worse, you risk alienating and losing valued staff, customers, and stakeholders as you sidestep or ignore their opinions, advice, feelings, and personal circumstances, with a single-minded approach to speed.
Maybe this results in a small course correction. Maybe you need to repeat the whole job. Maybe you move into damage control or face a PR nightmare. Maybe you need to hire new staff or attract new customers.
Yes, we know it sounds dramatic, but by focusing solely on speed, you risk delays, costs, and relationship breakdowns which result in greater expense, and more time and love lost, than if you had never made the changes in the first place.
This phenomenon is known as the efficiency paradox.
Five areas all business owners need to be mindful of with the efficiency paradox:
It’s vital to keep a close focus on your quality control when trying to accelerate. But some trade-offs may be possible.
These top ten trade-offs are:
With each of these ten trade-offs, you must weigh up the potential fallout against the potential gains, particularly in customer satisfaction, brand reputation, staff and customer safety, and long-term sustainability. If you’re unsure about any of this, Target State can help.
In the battle between efficiency and quality – find your sweet spot.
Balancing the quality and efficiency seesaw is an achievable goal. But not a static one. With the right amount of monitoring, your organisation will get there. The checklist below gives you key areas to consider in your ongoing efficiency maintenance.
Okay, we’ve found the sweet spot – how do we maintain this level of efficiency without a sacrifice to our quality?
We know that with any change comes a whole raft of feelings from excitement to resentment.
At all levels of your organisation, you require buy-in and commitment for business change to work. Your management team being excited about the possibilities is not enough. Get everyone onboard, show them the benefits and they’ll all be invested in your end goal.
There are several strategies you can use to achieve this:
Okay, I’m convinced I need to avoid the efficiency paradox. What steps do I need to take?
Improved efficiency can have a knock-on effect on quality. But there is a sweet spot between efficiency and quality. And it’s not static. Close monitoring, course correcting, and clear communication can keep you – or get you back – on track.
If you want to improve efficiency while steering clear of the efficiency paradox, speak to us at Target State. We’re always up for a chat and coffee. Please get in touch and let us know how we can help you and your business.
Balancing the quality and efficiency seesaw is an achievable goal. But not a static one. With the right amount of monitoring, your organisation will get there.
10
How MSPs Lead the Charge with Personalised and Strategic IT Services. As organisations look to digitise more of their systems and processes…
11
TLDR: When it comes to combining your people, systems, processes, and policies successfully, you should approach mergers or acquisitions the…
12
In our last white paper, we laid out the top 10 risks of digital transformation. This blog will look at 5 main categories of risk: people an…
"One of Ant's strengths is relating to owners in a visionary sense and talking to people who are on the ground...[Ant has a] wide understanding of different systems, processes and applications and can articulate where we're going and what the possibilities are...working with Ant has changed the way we make decisions about IT structures and support systems."
We hired Ant to support us with an important project after he was highly recommended by colleagues. Ant was responsive, speedy, super-helpful and helped us to make key decisions. We appreciated his broad experience, and his ability to hold a high level strategic view alongside expert advice on details. We will definitely be consulting with Ant again and are happy to recommend him.
"We don’t need a full-time CTO [chief technology officer]. Ant knows enough about our business he can deliver it virtually. He can translate things for us. During project management, Ant came into his own... Ant gets his head round your business and [took his time] understanding our context. He was really clear about pausing on investment into the app...Ant's inquisitive, curious and approachable - he's very easy to work with."
"Ant was really quick to understand the business model and our processes and IT structures."
"Ant helped us at the early stages of Aerotruth helping us to plan our technical infrastructure and ensure we built a product that would scale. Ant was great to work with and we really valued his support and contribution to Aerotruth"
"No question has ever been too silly. Ant's been accommodating and helped me understand. I've valued that he understands the charitable sector really well. He can look through the experience that he has with larger organisations and what's the reality for a small and mighty charity where you don't have teams of people that can come in and project manage an IT project"
"Having Anthony was really valuable – to lean in on his skillset – and his connections. He was able to provide impartial advice about the different strengths [of the providers]. It was important that we undertook a good due diligence process. Having Anthony there meant we had impartial selection as well, which is very important to us and [something] other not-for-profits [could benefit from]."